Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40
61 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adb6b/adb6b6dbb50e00fd8deaef5aea86c0a5d53b5fa1" alt="Fujifilm S9900w front Fujifilm S9900w front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f06f6/f06f6c9e15fa0fed6b2180ed4f4f8101d4e0e6ad" alt="Leica V-Lux 40 front Leica V-Lux 40 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
48 Overall
41
Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 210g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Announced May 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Fujifilm S9900w and Leica V-Lux 40, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Leica. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and the V-Lux 40 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The Fujifilm S9900w was announced 2 years after the V-Lux 40 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Leica V-Lux 40 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm S9900w matches up versus the V-Lux 40 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm S9900w & Leica V-Lux 40. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery & Leica V-Lux 40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Leica V-Lux 40
Fujifilm S9900w | V-Lux 40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2015 | ![]() | May 2012 | Newer by 33 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 40 over the Fujifilm S9900w
V-Lux 40 | Fujifilm S9900w | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Leica V-Lux 40
Fujifilm S9900w | V-Lux 40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9900w features outside dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Leica V-Lux 40 has measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 210 grams (0.46 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm S9900w and Leica V-Lux 40 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w compared to the V-Lux 40.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26ae8/26ae8c167aa9448955c1df26e071194d1aa27c9e" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 size comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9900w and V-Lux 40 is 61 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/253b5/253b52837e7fc19b70c3ef2a2460169a994bf626" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The image here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9900w and V-Lux 40.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Fujifilm S9900w to give you more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm S9900w will have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16235/16235084b6814dc93366a74e0671765e2766aa3d" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4248/b4248664f4cd20a1c44a29d36e572ec20df8c55f" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm S9900w vs Leica V-Lux 40 Specifications
Fujifilm S9900w | Leica V-Lux 40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model | Fujifilm S9900w | Leica V-Lux 40 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2015-01-14 | 2012-05-10 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 210 gr (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | 210 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $719 | $699 |