Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200
61 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/adb6b/adb6b6dbb50e00fd8deaef5aea86c0a5d53b5fa1" alt="Fujifilm S9900w front Fujifilm S9900w front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01dd8/01dd8650dec0800f81d1bdb596554d9786c03bab" alt="Nikon Coolpix S8200 front Nikon Coolpix S8200 front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
47 Overall
42
Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Revealed January 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-350mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 213g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Revealed August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Fujifilm S9900w and Nikon S8200, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by companies FujiFilm and Nikon. The resolution of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and the S8200 (16MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The Fujifilm S9900w was revealed 3 years after the S8200 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S8200 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm S9900w scores vs the S8200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm S9900w & Nikon Coolpix S8200. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery & Nikon S8200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Nikon S8200
Fujifilm S9900w | S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2015 | ![]() | August 2011 | More modern by 42 months |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Nikon S8200 over the Fujifilm S9900w
S8200 | Fujifilm S9900w | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 961k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+501k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Nikon S8200
Fujifilm S9900w | S8200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9900w provides external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Nikon S8200 has sizing of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 213 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm S9900w and Nikon S8200 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w versus the S8200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16710/167109bd19b5f683d081aff74e558033c4d59e9e" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 size comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9900w and S8200 is 61 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb076/cb076710ec277bf3866795e18c02e788f0d35176" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by researching specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9900w and S8200.
All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos although you may want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The fresher Fujifilm S9900w provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d492e/d492ef9716cb6ab308466e453b1754f4aeff32bb" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 sensor size comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/366a7/366a7288f0f8cd572469cbd6bc5678516d7ca6a1" alt="Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Fujifilm S9900w vs Nikon S8200 Specifications
Fujifilm S9900w | Nikon Coolpix S8200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Nikon |
Model | Fujifilm S9900w | Nikon Coolpix S8200 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2015-01-14 | 2011-08-24 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 25-350mm (14.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 961k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | 213 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | 250 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 4 x AA | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $719 | $329 |