Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus VR-320
61 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Launched January 2015
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus VR-320, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S9900w was introduced 3 years later than the VR-320 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a in-depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm S9900w grades against the VR-320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm S9900w | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | July 2011 | More recent by 43 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Fujifilm S9900w
VR-320 | Fujifilm S9900w |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus VR-320
Fujifilm S9900w | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm S9900w offers external dimensions of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm S9900w and Olympus VR-320 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w versus the VR-320.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9900w and VR-320 is 61 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The photograph underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm S9900w and VR-320.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Fujifilm S9900w to offer you greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm S9900w provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9900w vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Fujifilm S9900w | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm S9900w | Olympus VR-320 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-01-14 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 670 grams (1.48 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | 4 x AA | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $719 | $179 |