Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
61 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Released January 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2012
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Fujifilm S9900w versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm S9900w was introduced 2 years after the Galaxy Camera 3G which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm S9900w matches up against the Galaxy Camera 3G when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm S9900w & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
Fujifilm S9900w | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2015 | August 2012 | More modern by 29 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 0k | Crisper display (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Fujifilm S9900w
Galaxy Camera 3G | Fujifilm S9900w | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
Fujifilm S9900w | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9900w has outer measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") along with a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has sizing of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
See the Fujifilm S9900w versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w versus the Galaxy Camera 3G.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm S9900w and Galaxy Camera 3G is 61 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The image below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm S9900w and Galaxy Camera 3G.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of images but you should consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent Fujifilm S9900w will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
Fujifilm S9900w | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm S9900w | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-01-14 | 2012-08-29 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | - |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1700s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 305 gr (0.67 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $719 | $606 |