Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung HZ25W
61 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
70 Imaging
34 Features
32 Overall
33
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2015
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Launched July 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm S9900w and Samsung HZ25W, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm S9900w was unveiled 4 years later than the HZ25W and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung HZ25W being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the Fujifilm S9900w scores against the HZ25W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm S9900w & Samsung HZ25W. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery & Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Samsung HZ25W
| Fujifilm S9900w | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2015 |  | July 2010 | Fresher by 56 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Fujifilm S9900w
| HZ25W | Fujifilm S9900w |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Samsung HZ25W
| Fujifilm S9900w | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9900w has physical measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") and a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has sizing of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm S9900w and Samsung HZ25W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w vs the HZ25W.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm S9900w and HZ25W is 61 and 70 respectively.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The graphic below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9900w and HZ25W.
All in all, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Fujifilm S9900w to offer extra detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm S9900w provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Fujifilm S9900w | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm S9900w | Samsung HZ25W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB5000 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-01-14 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | 5.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 gr (1.48 pounds) | 428 gr (0.94 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $719 | $350 |