Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB35F
61 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 670g - 123 x 87 x 116mm
- Announced January 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm S9900w and Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm S9900w (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm S9900w was launched 13 months after the WB35F making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm S9900w being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the Fujifilm S9900w matches up versus the WB35F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm S9900w & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm S9900w Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S9900w over the Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm S9900w | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2015 |  | January 2014 | More modern by 13 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm S9900w
| WB35F | Fujifilm S9900w |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm S9900w and Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm S9900w | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm S9900w enjoys external measurements of 123mm x 87mm x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") accompanied by a weight of 670 grams (1.48 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has sizing of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm S9900w and Samsung WB35F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm S9900w compared to the WB35F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm S9900w and WB35F is 61 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm S9900w and WB35F.
Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you need to factor the age of the cameras into account. The younger Fujifilm S9900w provides an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Fujifilm S9900w vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Fujifilm S9900w | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm S9900w | Samsung WB35F |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-01-14 | 2014-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 920 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1700 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (6oi), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 670 grams (1.48 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 123 x 87 x 116mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 4.6") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $719 | $130 |
