Fujifilm X-A1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
87 Imaging
58 Features
61 Overall
59
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Fujifilm X-A1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 330g - 117 x 67 x 39mm
- Launched November 2013
- New Model is Fujifilm X-A2
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
Fujifilm X-A1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Fujifilm X-A1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-A1 (16MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the Fujifilm X-A1 (APS-C) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) have totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-A1 was unveiled 6 years before the X1D II 50C and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm X-A1 grades versus the X1D II 50C with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X-A1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-A1 & Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm X-A1 Gallery & Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-A1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-A1 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Fujifilm X-A1
X1D II 50C | Fujifilm X-A1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | November 2013 | More recent by 67 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 920k | Clearer screen (+1440k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-A1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-A1 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-A1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-A1 offers outer measurements of 117mm x 67mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has proportions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-A1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-A1 compared to the X1D II 50C.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-A1 and X1D II 50C is 87 and 60 respectively.
Fujifilm X-A1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-A1 and X1D II 50C.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-A1 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer you extra detail having an extra 35MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-A1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-A1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-A1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Fujifilm X-A1 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model | Fujifilm X-A1 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-11-30 | 2019-06-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 368.2mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 8272 x 6200 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Hasselblad X |
Available lenses | 54 | 13 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3.60 inches |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 2,360k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,690k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/10000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 6.0fps | 2.7fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (ISO200m) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto / Forced Flash / Suppressed Flash / Slow Synchro / Rear-curtain Synchro / Commander | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 30p, Continuous recording: up to approx. 14 min./1280 x 720 30p, Continuous recording: up to approx. 27 min. | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 2720x1530 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 67 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W126 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec.) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD memory card / SDHC memory card / SDXC (UHS-I) memory card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Single | Two |
Price at launch | $329 | $5,750 |