Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
86 Imaging
60 Features
70 Overall
64


60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 331g - 117 x 67 x 40mm
- Released December 2016
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D

Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-A10 (16MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the Fujifilm X-A10 (APS-C) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) provide different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm X-A10 was announced 3 years before the X1D II 50C which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm X-A10 grades vs the X1D II 50C in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-A10 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-A10 Gallery and Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-A10 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-A10 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Fujifilm X-A10
X1D II 50C | Fujifilm X-A10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | December 2016 | Newer by 31 months |
Display size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1040k | Clearer display (+1320k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-A10 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-A10 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-A10 comes with exterior dimensions of 117mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has proportions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-A10 compared to the X1D II 50C.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-A10 and X1D II 50C is 86 and 60 respectively.

Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by going over a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-A10 and X1D II 50C.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-A10 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh tougher and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will deliver extra detail with its extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-A10 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Fujifilm X-A10 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model | Fujifilm X-A10 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-12-01 | 2019-06-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 51MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 8272 x 6200 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Hasselblad X |
Number of lenses | 54 | 13 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.60 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 2,360k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,690k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/10000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per sec | 2.7 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro, rear-curtain synchro, commander | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p. 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p,24p) | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None1920x1080 | 2720x1530 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 331 grams (0.73 lbs) | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 117 x 67 x 40mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W126S | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, smile, buddy, group) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Single | 2 |
Retail cost | $499 | $5,750 |