Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D
86 Imaging
60 Features
66 Overall
62
![Fujifilm X-A10 front Fujifilm X-A10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X-A10/Fujifilm-X-A10-front.jpg)
![Hasselblad X2D 100c front Hasselblad X2D 100c front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Hasselblad-X2D-100c/Hasselblad-X2D-front.jpg)
56 Imaging
93 Features
78 Overall
87
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 331g - 117 x 67 x 40mm
- Released December 2016
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Launched September 2022
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Fujifilm X-A10 versus Hasselblad X2D, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-A10 (16MP) and X2D (100MP) and the Fujifilm X-A10 (APS-C) and X2D (Medium format) feature totally different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm X-A10 was introduced 6 years prior to the X2D and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-A10 matches up vs the X2D when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-A10 & Hasselblad X2D 100c. The whole galleries are available at Fujifilm X-A10 Gallery & Hasselblad X2D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-A10 over the Hasselblad X2D
Fujifilm X-A10 | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Fujifilm X-A10
X2D | Fujifilm X-A10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2022 | ![]() | December 2016 | More recent by 70 months |
Display sizing | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1040k | Sharper display (+1320k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-A10 and Hasselblad X2D
Fujifilm X-A10 | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-A10 offers outer measurements of 117mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X2D has dimensions of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
See the Fujifilm X-A10 versus Hasselblad X2D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm X-A10 versus the X2D.
![Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D size comparison Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-A10-vs-Hasselblad-X2D-100c-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-A10 and X2D is 86 and 56 respectively.
![Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-A10-vs-Hasselblad-X2D-100c-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The photograph here may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-A10 and X2D.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-A10 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Hasselblad X2D will offer greater detail using its extra 84MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-A10 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-X-A10-vs-Hasselblad-X2D-100c-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-A10-vs-Hasselblad-X2D-100c-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-A10 vs Hasselblad X2D Specifications
Fujifilm X-A10 | Hasselblad X2D 100c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model | Fujifilm X-A10 | Hasselblad X2D 100c |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2016-12-01 | 2022-09-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 368.2mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 100MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 11656 x 8742 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 294 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Hasselblad X |
Total lenses | 54 | 13 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.60 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 2,360k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 5,760k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4080 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.0 frames per sec | 3.3 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro, rear-curtain synchro, commander | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p. 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p,24p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | None1920x1080 | - |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 331 gr (0.73 lbs) | 895 gr (1.97 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 67 x 40mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 photographs | 420 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, smile, buddy, group) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $499 | $8,199 |