Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262
86 Imaging
67 Features
75 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18b2b/18b2bec9d2fc4b5f4aa109b4038998ca6e097305" alt="Fujifilm X-A3 front Fujifilm X-A3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e12/b8e123edbad624b77bc200569372c45fa64c0b47" alt="Leica M Typ 262 front Leica M Typ 262 front"
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 339g - 117 x 67 x 40mm
- Announced August 2016
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-A2
- Updated by Fujifilm X-A5
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2015
- Alternate Name is Typ 262
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Leica. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-A3 (24MP) and the M Typ 262 (24MP) is very close but the Fujifilm X-A3 (APS-C) and M Typ 262 (Full frame) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The Fujifilm X-A3 was manufactured 10 months later than the M Typ 262 so they are both of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a simple view of how the Fujifilm X-A3 scores vs the M Typ 262 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-A3 & Leica M Typ 262. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-A3 Gallery & Leica M Typ 262 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-A3 over the Leica M Typ 262
Fujifilm X-A3 | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2016 | ![]() | November 2015 | Fresher by 10 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Fujifilm X-A3
M Typ 262 | Fujifilm X-A3 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-A3 and Leica M Typ 262
Fujifilm X-A3 | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-A3 has got physical measurements of 117mm x 67mm x 40mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 339 grams (0.75 lbs) whilst the Leica M Typ 262 has sizing of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X-A3 against the M Typ 262.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a26dd/a26dd443e8a32fd2a905c066fe83619681e31e39" alt="Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 size comparison Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-A3 and M Typ 262 is 86 and 77 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03b7d/03b7d51783d459bca1c89b01fc88bc20f084126f" alt="Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to see the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The graphic below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-A3 and M Typ 262.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have got the exact same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-A3 features the smaller sensor which should make achieving bokeh more difficult. The fresher Fujifilm X-A3 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4233/f423362df9d3b409cb5ba1df4489033043df6cdd" alt="Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d874a/d874a867a69b0026d8665e3c867b2e5fa2e081b6" alt="Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm X-A3 vs Leica M Typ 262 Specifications
Fujifilm X-A3 | Leica M Typ 262 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model | Fujifilm X-A3 | Leica M Typ 262 |
Otherwise known as | - | Typ 262 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2016-08-25 | 2015-11-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR Processor II | Maestro |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 35.8 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 855.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5952 x 3976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 77 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Leica M |
Available lenses | 54 | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash on, flash off, slow synchro, rear-curtain synchro, commander | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 24p) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | NP-W126S lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 339 gr (0.75 lb) | 600 gr (1.32 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 67 x 40mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W126 | BP-SCL2 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $480 | $5,069 |