Fujifilm X-E1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
85 Imaging
57 Features
55 Overall
56
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Fujifilm X-E1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Boost to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 350g - 129 x 75 x 38mm
- Revealed February 2013
- Renewed by Fujifilm X-E2
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
Fujifilm X-E1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm X-E1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-E1 (16MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the Fujifilm X-E1 (APS-C) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) come with different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X-E1 was unveiled 7 years before the X1D II 50C and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a short summary of how the Fujifilm X-E1 scores vs the X1D II 50C with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X-E1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-E1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-E1 Gallery and Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-E1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-E1 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Fujifilm X-E1
X1D II 50C | Fujifilm X-E1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | February 2013 | More recent by 76 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.60" | 2.8" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1900k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-E1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-E1 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-E1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-E1 comes with physical dimensions of 129mm x 75mm x 38mm (5.1" x 3.0" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has sizing of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-E1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X-E1 vs the X1D II 50C.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-E1 and X1D II 50C is 85 and 60 respectively.
Fujifilm X-E1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-E1 and X1D II 50C.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-E1 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will deliver more detail having an extra 35MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-E1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-E1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-E1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Fujifilm X-E1 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model type | Fujifilm X-E1 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-02-28 | 2019-06-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR Pro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS I | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 8272 x 6200 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 117 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Hasselblad X |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 13 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.8 inch | 3.60 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 2,360k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 3,690k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/10000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames/s | 2.7 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (24 fps) | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 2720x1530 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 350 grams (0.77 pounds) | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) |
Dimensions | 129 x 75 x 38mm (5.1" x 3.0" x 1.5") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | W126 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Single | Two |
Price at launch | $600 | $5,750 |