Fujifilm X-E2 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
85 Imaging
58 Features
73 Overall
64
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Fujifilm X-E2 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 350g - 129 x 75 x 37mm
- Released March 2014
- Superseded the Fujifilm X-E1
- Successor is Fujifilm X-E2S
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- Updated by Hasselblad X2D
Fujifilm X-E2 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm X-E2 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-E2 (16MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the Fujifilm X-E2 (APS-C) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) have different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm X-E2 was released 6 years earlier than the X1D II 50C which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm X-E2 grades versus the X1D II 50C for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-E2 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-E2 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-E2 Gallery and Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-E2 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-E2 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Fujifilm X-E2
X1D II 50C | Fujifilm X-E2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | March 2014 | More modern by 64 months | |
Screen size | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1040k | Clearer screen (+1320k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-E2 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-E2 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-E2 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-E2 provides outer dimensions of 129mm x 75mm x 37mm (5.1" x 3.0" x 1.5") having a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs) while the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-E2 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-E2 and the X1D II 50C.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-E2 and X1D II 50C is 85 and 60 respectively.
Fujifilm X-E2 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading a spec sheet. The picture underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-E2 and X1D II 50C.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-E2 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer more detail as a result of its extra 35MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-E2 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-E2 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-E2 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Fujifilm X-E2 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model | Fujifilm X-E2 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-03-05 | 2019-06-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 368.2mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 8272 x 6200 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Hasselblad X |
Total lenses | 54 | 13 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3.60 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 2,360k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 3,690k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/10000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 2.7 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (@ ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear-curtain | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | 1/2000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 2720x1530 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 350g (0.77 lbs) | 725g (1.60 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 75 x 37mm (5.1" x 3.0" x 1.5") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | W126 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 1 | Dual |
Cost at launch | $450 | $5,750 |