Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X1D
61 Imaging
69 Features
85 Overall
75
60 Imaging
83 Features
74 Overall
79
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X1D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched February 2018
- Newer Model is Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2016
- Updated by Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X1D Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X1D, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and X1D (51MP) and the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and X1D (Medium format) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durabilityThe Fujifilm X-H1 was revealed 21 months after the X1D which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm X-H1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm X-H1 scores vs the X1D when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X1D Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-H1 and Hasselblad X1D. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery and Hasselblad X1D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Hasselblad X1D
Fujifilm X-H1 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2018 | June 2016 | Newer by 21 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Fujifilm X-H1
X1D | Fujifilm X-H1 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Hasselblad X1D
Fujifilm X-H1 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X1D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H1 has got outside measurements of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Hasselblad X1D has specifications of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X1D in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 against the X1D.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H1 and X1D is 61 and 60 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X1D Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by looking through specs. The image here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-H1 and X1D.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-H1 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Hasselblad X1D will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 27MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-H1 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X1D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Hasselblad X1D Specifications
Fujifilm X-H1 | Hasselblad X1D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model type | Fujifilm X-H1 | Hasselblad X1D |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2018-02-14 | 2016-06-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | X-Processor Pro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 51 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 8272 x 6200 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 325 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Hasselblad X |
Total lenses | 54 | 4 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 14.0 frames per sec | 2.3 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (25p) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 673 gr (1.48 lbs) | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
Retail cost | $1,300 | $6,495 |