Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1 II
61 Imaging
68 Features
85 Overall
74


68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Released February 2018
- Successor is Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 III

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is very similar but the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizing.

The Fujifilm X-H1 was released 18 months after the E-M1 II making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the Fujifilm X-H1 grades vs the E-M1 II with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-H1 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-H1 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | ![]() | September 2016 | More modern by 18 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Fujifilm X-H1
E-M1 II | Fujifilm X-H1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-H1 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurement |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-H1 comes with physical dimensions of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M1 II in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 vs the E-M1 II.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M1 II is 61 and 68 respectively.

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to picture the gap between sensor sizes only by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M1 II.
As you have seen, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-H1 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X-H1 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-H1 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Fujifilm X-H1 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-H1 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2018-02-14 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | X-Processor Pro | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 325 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 54 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 14.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MOV, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 673 gr (1.48 lbs) | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 350 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Two | Two |
Retail pricing | $1,300 | $1,700 |