Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10
61 Imaging
68 Features
85 Overall
74
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched February 2018
- Newer Model is Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M10, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and E-M10 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and E-M10 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm X-H1 was manufactured 3 years later than the E-M10 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm X-H1 grades vs the E-M10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-H1 & Olympus OM-D E-M10. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Olympus E-M10
| Fujifilm X-H1 | E-M10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | March 2014 | Fresher by 48 months |
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 1037k | Clearer display (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Fujifilm X-H1
| E-M10 | Fujifilm X-H1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M10
| Fujifilm X-H1 | E-M10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H1 has got outside dimensions of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 has specifications of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") and a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 versus the E-M10.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M10 is 61 and 82 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The graphic here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M10.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-H1 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X-H1 will give more detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-H1 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications
| Fujifilm X-H1 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model | Fujifilm X-H1 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2018-02-14 | 2014-03-18 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | X-Processor Pro | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 325 | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 1,440k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.58x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (ISO100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual（1/1（FULL）～1/64） |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 673 gr (1.48 lb) | 396 gr (0.87 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 884 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 shots | 320 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 2 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $1,300 | $600 |