Clicky

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III

Portability
61
Imaging
69
Features
85
Overall
75
Fujifilm X-H1 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs

Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Refreshed by Fujifilm X-H2
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuit

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview

The following is a detailed comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M10 III, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) boast different sensor dimensions.

AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsApp

The Fujifilm X-H1 was introduced 6 months after the E-M10 III so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm X-H1 scores vs the E-M10 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth Filming
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 Fujifilm X-H1 E-M10 III 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Fujifilm X-H1

 E-M10 III Fujifilm X-H1 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M10 III

 Fujifilm X-H1 E-M10 III 
RevealedFebruary 2018August 2017Same age
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Display resolution1040k1040kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison

If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H1 provides outside measurements of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 III has specifications of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).

See the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 compared to the E-M10 III.

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M10 III is 61 and 80 respectively.

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison

Normally, its difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions simply by going through a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M10 III.

As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-H1 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm X-H1 will show more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively.

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
TikTok Developing Photo App to Challenge Instagram's Dominance

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Fujifilm X-H1
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
81
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detection focusing
supports RAW formats
73
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW files
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To Cameras

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X-H1 Street photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 III Street photography highlights
77
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
comes with touch focus
weather proofing
77
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
boasts touch focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competitors (410g)
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-H1 Sports photography info
Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography info
78
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
comes with phase detect AF
bad battery pack (310 shots)
69
quiet mode (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect autofocus
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks Suggest

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-H1 Travel photography features
Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography features
64
weather proofing
has bluetooth
comes with touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
bad battery pack (310 per charge)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
67
boasts touch focus
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
heavier than competitors (410g)
display isn't selfie friendly
Leica struggles with L-Mount camera sales, tougher than Q or M

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-H1 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography highlights
79
focusing manually
swap lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
has dual storage slots
bad battery pack (310 shots)
80
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
Europe Approves Revolutionary AI Legislation

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm X-H1
Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
35
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection focusing
good video quality (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone jack
does not feature selfie friendly screen
32
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection autofocus
good video quality (3840 x 2160 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
Apple patent reveals improved iPhone camera durability

Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M10 III
 Fujifilm X-H1Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm X-H1 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2018-02-14 2017-08-31
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip X-Processor Pro TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 23.5 x 15.6mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor area 366.6mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 12800 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 -
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW support
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 100
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 325 121
Lens
Lens mounting type Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 54 107
Crop factor 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of display Tilting Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 3,690 thousand dot 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.75x 0.62x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs 1/16000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 14.0fps 8.6fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 5.80 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 secs 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 673 grams (1.48 pounds) 410 grams (0.90 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 310 pictures 330 pictures
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported)
Storage slots 2 One
Cost at release $1,300 $650