Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X
Portability
61 Imaging
68 Features
85 Overall
74
61 Imaging
68 Features
85 Overall
74
Portability
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Released February 2018
- Renewed by Fujifilm X-H2
Olympus E-M1X
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Olympus E-M1X, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and the E-M1X (20MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) use different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe Fujifilm X-H1 was unveiled 11 months prior to the E-M1X so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm X-H1 matches up against the E-M1X in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-H1 & Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery & Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Olympus E-M1X
| Fujifilm X-H1 | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Fujifilm X-H1
| E-M1X | Fujifilm X-H1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2019 |  | February 2018 | Fresher by 11 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M1X
| Fujifilm X-H1 | E-M1X | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H1 has outer dimensions of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1X has specifications of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Olympus E-M1X in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 vs the E-M1X.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M1X is 61 and 54 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M1X.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-H1 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm X-H1 will give you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-H1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M1X as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW files
has manual focus
MP count decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M1X as a Street photography camera
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
boasts focus by touch
environment sealing
screen articulates
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
features touch focus
weather proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than average in class (997 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 Sports photography features
Olympus E-M1X Sports photography features
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
terrible battery power (310 CIPA)
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
high max frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proof
great battery (870 shots)
supports phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M1X Travel photography factors
environment sealing
connects via bluetooth
boasts focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
terrible battery power (310 CIPA)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
great battery (870 shots)
weather proof
supports bluetooth
features touch focus
MP count decent (20MP)
selfie friendly display
heavier than average in class (997g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 Landscape photography features
Olympus E-M1X Landscape photography features
focusing manually
change lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
does not have anti aliasing filter
exports RAW files
environment sealing
two card slots
terrible battery power (310 CIPA)
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
weather proof
great battery (870 CIPA)
two card slots
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Fujifilm X-H1
Vlogging with Olympus E-M1X
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focus
good video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone socket
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
selfie friendly display
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic socket
heavier than average in class (997 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
| Fujifilm X-H1 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-H1 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Released | 2018-02-14 | 2019-01-24 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | X-Processor Pro | Dual TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 325 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 673g (1.48 pounds) | 997g (2.20 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 images | 870 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Built-in |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | - |
| Card slots | Dual | Dual |
| Launch price | $1,300 | $2,999 |