Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X
61 Imaging
68 Features
85 Overall
74
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Released February 2018
- Renewed by Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Announced January 2019
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
Here is a extensive assessment of the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Olympus E-M1X, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and the E-M1X (20MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) use different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm X-H1 was unveiled 11 months prior to the E-M1X so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the Fujifilm X-H1 matches up against the E-M1X in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-H1 & Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery & Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Olympus E-M1X
Fujifilm X-H1 | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Fujifilm X-H1
E-M1X | Fujifilm X-H1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2019 | February 2018 | Fresher by 11 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Olympus E-M1X
Fujifilm X-H1 | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H1 has outer dimensions of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") along with a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1X has specifications of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-H1 versus Olympus E-M1X in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 vs the E-M1X.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M1X is 61 and 54 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-H1 and E-M1X.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-H1 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Fujifilm X-H1 will give you greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-H1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
Fujifilm X-H1 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-H1 | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2018-02-14 | 2019-01-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | X-Processor Pro | Dual TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 325 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 673g (1.48 pounds) | 997g (2.20 pounds) |
Dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 images | 870 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Built-in |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | - |
Card slots | Dual | Dual |
Launch price | $1,300 | $2,999 |