Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic G95
61 Imaging
68 Features
85 Overall
74
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 673g - 140 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched February 2018
- Successor is Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Revealed April 2019
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-G90
- Earlier Model is Panasonic G85
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Below is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 and Panasonic G95, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Panasonic. The image resolution of the Fujifilm X-H1 (24MP) and the G95 (20.3MP) is pretty close but the Fujifilm X-H1 (APS-C) and G95 (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm X-H1 was announced 13 months prior to the G95 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the Fujifilm X-H1 grades versus the G95 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-H1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H1 Gallery & Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H1 over the Panasonic G95
Fujifilm X-H1 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Fujifilm X-H1
G95 | Fujifilm X-H1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2019 | February 2018 | More recent by 13 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 1040k | Clearer screen (+200k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H1 and Panasonic G95
Fujifilm X-H1 | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-H1 has external dimensions of 140mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") having a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs) whilst the Panasonic G95 has measurements of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") and a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-H1 and Panasonic G95 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-H1 against the G95.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-H1 and G95 is 61 and 67 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-H1 and G95.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-H1 using its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-H1 will render extra detail with its extra 3.7MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-H1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H1 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Fujifilm X-H1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
Model | Fujifilm X-H1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Other name | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2018-02-14 | 2019-04-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | X-Processor Pro | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 20.3MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 325 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 54 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.75x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 14.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, standard, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 673 grams (1.48 lb) | 536 grams (1.18 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 97 x 86mm (5.5" x 3.8" x 3.4") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 images | 290 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,300 | $998 |