Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
85 Imaging
58 Features
56 Overall
57
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Introduced April 2014
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm X-H2 and Leica T Type 701, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Leica. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and T Type 701 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm X-H2 was manufactured 8 years after the T Type 701 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-H2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Leica T Type 701 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-H2 scores vs the T Type 701 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-H2 and Leica T Typ 701. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery and Leica T Type 701 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Leica T Type 701
Fujifilm X-H2 | T Type 701 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2022 | April 2014 | More modern by 102 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 1300k | Clearer display (+320k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Fujifilm X-H2
T Type 701 | Fujifilm X-H2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.7" | 3.00" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Leica T Type 701
Fujifilm X-H2 | T Type 701 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H2 has got exterior measurements of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Leica T Type 701 has specifications of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-H2 and Leica T Type 701 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 versus the T Type 701.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-H2 and T Type 701 is 62 and 85 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-H2 and T Type 701.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Fujifilm X-H2 to offer more detail due to its extra 24 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-H2 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Leica T Typ 701 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model type | Fujifilm X-H2 | Leica T Typ 701 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-09-08 | 2014-04-24 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 4944 x 3278 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12500 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Leica L |
Available lenses | 82 | 4 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.00 inch | 3.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,620k dot | 1,300k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/180000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 15.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 7680x4320 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660 gr (1.46 lb) | 384 gr (0.85 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1082 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 images | 400 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W235 | BP-DC13 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Launch price | $1,999 | $1,603 |