Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
![Fujifilm X-H2 front Fujifilm X-H2 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X-H2/Fujifilm-X-H2-front.jpg)
![Leica T Typ 701 front Leica T Typ 701 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Leica-T-Typ-701/Leica-T--Type-701-front.jpg)
85 Imaging
58 Features
56 Overall
57
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Introduced April 2014
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Fujifilm X-H2 and Leica T Type 701, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Leica. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and T Type 701 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (APS-C).
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm X-H2 was manufactured 8 years after the T Type 701 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-H2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Leica T Type 701 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-H2 scores vs the T Type 701 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-H2 and Leica T Typ 701. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery and Leica T Type 701 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Leica T Type 701
Fujifilm X-H2 | T Type 701 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2022 | ![]() | April 2014 | More modern by 102 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 1300k | Clearer display (+320k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Leica T Type 701 over the Fujifilm X-H2
T Type 701 | Fujifilm X-H2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.7" | ![]() | 3.00" | Larger display (+0.7") |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Leica T Type 701
Fujifilm X-H2 | T Type 701 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H2 has got exterior measurements of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Leica T Type 701 has specifications of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-H2 and Leica T Type 701 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 versus the T Type 701.
![Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 size comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-H2-vs-Leica-T-Typ-701-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-H2 and T Type 701 is 62 and 85 respectively.
![Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-H2-vs-Leica-T-Typ-701-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-H2 and T Type 701.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Fujifilm X-H2 to offer more detail due to its extra 24 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-H2 should have an edge in sensor innovation.
![Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-X-H2-vs-Leica-T-Typ-701-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-H2-vs-Leica-T-Typ-701-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Leica T Type 701 Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Leica T Typ 701 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model type | Fujifilm X-H2 | Leica T Typ 701 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-09-08 | 2014-04-24 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 4944 x 3278 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 12500 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Leica L |
Available lenses | 82 | 4 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.00 inch | 3.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,620k dot | 1,300k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/180000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 15.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 7680x4320 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660 gr (1.46 lb) | 384 gr (0.85 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1082 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 images | 400 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W235 | BP-DC13 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Launch price | $1,999 | $1,603 |