Fujifilm X-H2 vs OM System OM-5
Portability
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
Portability
80 Imaging
64 Features
88 Overall
73
80 Imaging
64 Features
88 Overall
73
Fujifilm X-H2 vs OM System OM-5 Key Specs
Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Older Model is Fujifilm X-H1
OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Revealed October 2022
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm X-H2 vs OM System OM-5 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm X-H2 vs OM System OM-5, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and OM System OM-5 (20MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and OM System OM-5 (Four Thirds) boast different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-H2 was announced about the same time to the OM System OM-5 and they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm X-H2 matches up vs the OM System OM-5 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X-H2 vs OM System OM-5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-H2 & OM System OM-5. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & OM System OM-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the OM System OM-5
| Fujifilm X-H2 | OM System OM-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 1040k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Fujifilm X-H2
| OM System OM-5 | Fujifilm X-H2 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and OM System OM-5
| Fujifilm X-H2 | OM System OM-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2022 |  | October 2022 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.00" |  | 3.00" | Equal screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Both good for selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs OM System OM-5 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-H2 provides external dimensions of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the OM System OM-5 has dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-H2 vs OM System OM-5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 versus the OM System OM-5.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-H2 and OM System OM-5 is 62 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs OM System OM-5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing technical specs. The image here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-H2 and OM System OM-5.
As you can tell, both of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-H2 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Fujifilm X-H2 will offer you greater detail with its extra 20 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots more aggressively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs OM System OM-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 Portrait photography advice
OM System OM-5 Portrait photography advice
focusing manually
great resolution (40 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
focusing manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 Street photography features
OM System OM-5 Street photography features
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
environment sealing
heavier than competition in class (660g)
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
comes with touch focus
environment proof
great high ISO (25,600)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 Sports photography advice
OM System OM-5 Sports photography advice
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/180,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
great resolution (40 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
great battery life (680 per charge)
comes with phase detect autofocus
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/32,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
comes with phase detect AF
low battery power (310 per charge)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 Travel photography advice
OM System OM-5 Travel photography advice
great battery life (680 per charge)
environment sealing
has bluetooth
comes with touch to focus
great resolution (40 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
heavier than competition in class (660 grams)
environment proof
has bluetooth
comes with touch focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
display is selfie friendly
low battery power (310 CIPA)
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Fujifilm X-H2
Landscape photography with OM System OM-5
focusing manually
switch lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
screen is a good size (3.00 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
great resolution (40 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
no anti aliasing filter
delivers RAW formats
environment sealing
great battery life (680 per charge)
has dual storage slots
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3.00 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
environment proof
low battery power (310 per charge)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 as a Vlogging camera
OM System OM-5 as a Vlogging camera
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (7680 x 4320 pxls)
does have mic jack
heavier than competition in class (660 grams)
display is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have external microphone support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm X-H2 vs OM System OM-5 Specifications
| Fujifilm X-H2 | OM System OM-5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-H2 | OM System OM-5 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2022-09-08 | 2022-10-26 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 40MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 82 | 119 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3.00 inch | 3.00 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,620k dots | 1,040k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.68x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/180000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 15.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 7680x4320 | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 660 grams (1.46 pounds) | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 680 photos | 310 photos |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W235 | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | Dual | One |
| Cost at launch | $1,999 | $1,200 |