Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Announced September 2022
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 II
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Fujifilm X-H2 versus Olympus E-M1, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and E-M1 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and E-M1 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-H2 was launched 8 years after the E-M1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the Fujifilm X-H2 scores against the E-M1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-H2 & Olympus OM-D E-M1. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Olympus E-M1
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2022 | October 2013 | Newer by 108 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 1037k | Sharper display (+583k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Fujifilm X-H2
E-M1 | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M1
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3.00" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-H2 enjoys outside dimensions of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 has dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") along with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-H2 versus Olympus E-M1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 compared to the E-M1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M1 is 62 and 71 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The picture here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M1.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-H2 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-H2 will result in more detail utilizing its extra 24 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-H2 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2022-09-08 | 2013-10-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePIC VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 82 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3.00" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,620 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/180000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 15.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/320s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 7680x4320 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660g (1.46 pounds) | 497g (1.10 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 757 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 shots | 350 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W235 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Launch cost | $1,999 | $799 |