Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 III
62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Fujifilm X-H2 versus Olympus E-M1 III, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe Fujifilm X-H2 was manufactured 2 years later than the E-M1 III and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm X-H2 grades versus the E-M1 III in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-H2 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Olympus E-M1 III
| Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2022 | February 2020 | More recent by 32 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+583k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Fujifilm X-H2
| E-M1 III | Fujifilm X-H2 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M1 III
| Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3.00" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-H2 offers external measurements of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 III has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-H2 versus Olympus E-M1 III in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 versus the E-M1 III.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M1 III is 62 and 67 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by researching specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M1 III.
Plainly, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-H2 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-H2 will result in extra detail due to its extra 20 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-H2 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
| Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2022-09-08 | 2020-02-11 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic IX |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 40 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 64 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 82 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3.00" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/180000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 15.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 7680x4320 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 660g (1.46 lb) | 580g (1.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 680 images | 420 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W235 | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
| Storage slots | Dual | Dual |
| Cost at release | $1,999 | $1,800 |