Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 II
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82


82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M10 II, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) use different sensor sizes.

The Fujifilm X-H2 was released 7 years later than the E-M10 II and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm X-H2 scores against the E-M10 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Olympus E-M10 II
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2022 | ![]() | August 2015 | Fresher by 86 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 1040k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Fujifilm X-H2
E-M10 II | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M10 II
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3.00" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-H2 features exterior measurements of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 II has dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M10 II in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 vs the E-M10 II.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M10 II is 62 and 82 respectively.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading specs. The visual below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M10 II.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-H2 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-H2 will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 24 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-H2 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-09-08 | 2015-08-25 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 82 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,620k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/180000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 15.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 7680x4320 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660g (1.46 lbs) | 390g (0.86 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 photos | 320 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W235 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $1,999 | $499 |