Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 III
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Announced September 2022
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 II
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 III, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Fujifilm X-H2 was brought out 5 years later than the E-M10 III and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-H2 grades versus the E-M10 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-H2 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2022 | August 2017 | Fresher by 62 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 1040k | Sharper display (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Fujifilm X-H2
E-M10 III | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M10 III
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3.00" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you should consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H2 features physical dimensions of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 III has specifications of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 vs the E-M10 III.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M10 III is 62 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M10 III.
All in all, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-H2 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Fujifilm X-H2 will offer greater detail having its extra 24MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-H2 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2022-09-08 | 2017-08-31 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 82 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3.00 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,620 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/180000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 15.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 7680x4320 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 660 gr (1.46 lb) | 410 gr (0.90 lb) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 pictures | 330 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W235 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Price at launch | $1,999 | $650 |