Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82


81 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M5 II

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 Overview
The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and E-M5 (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and E-M5 (Four Thirds) have different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm X-H2 was released 10 years after the E-M5 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm X-H2 scores against the E-M5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-H2 & Olympus OM-D E-M5. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Olympus E-M5
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2022 | ![]() | April 2012 | Newer by 127 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 610k | Clearer screen (+1010k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Fujifilm X-H2
E-M5 | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M5
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3.00" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-H2 has got outer dimensions of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Olympus E-M5 has proportions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 and the E-M5.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M5 is 62 and 81 respectively.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by researching a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M5.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-H2 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Fujifilm X-H2 will result in more detail as a result of its extra 24MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-H2 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-09-08 | 2012-04-30 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 82 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.00 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dot | 610 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/180000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 15.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 7680x4320 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660g (1.46 lb) | 425g (0.94 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 71 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 826 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 images | 360 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W235 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,999 | $799 |