Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62910/62910d377a481443615e2f3c48c7678cc9c467ae" alt="Fujifilm X-H2 front Fujifilm X-H2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87f98/87f9860bdd2f90e1ac1160944f3da7fb05966ce6" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front Olympus OM-D E-M5 II front"
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Launched September 2022
- Superseded the Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- New Model is Olympus E-M5 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Fujifilm X-H2 versus Olympus E-M5 II, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and E-M5 II (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and E-M5 II (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The Fujifilm X-H2 was introduced 7 years after the E-M5 II which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a short summation of how the Fujifilm X-H2 scores vs the E-M5 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-H2 & Olympus OM-D E-M5 II. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Olympus E-M5 II
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2022 | ![]() | February 2015 | More modern by 93 months |
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer screen (+583k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Fujifilm X-H2
E-M5 II | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M5 II
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Screen sizing | 3.00" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-H2 comes with outer measurements of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") having a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M5 II has measurements of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") having a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-H2 versus Olympus E-M5 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 against the E-M5 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3388c/3388c1a9e3eeb4b279248d37db140fef935701af" alt="Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II size comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M5 II is 62 and 80 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3861a/3861a13da44e8afd33fd814aa3a8241987530d91" alt="Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes merely by going through technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M5 II.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-H2 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Fujifilm X-H2 will produce extra detail using its extra 24MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-H2 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d435/1d435951edf7851906de2532ac95c5083840d2af" alt="Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/529c5/529c57b4083a68920d4436d564360c60c5044438" alt="Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 II Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-09-08 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 82 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,620 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/180000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 15.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 7680x4320 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 660g (1.46 lbs) | 469g (1.03 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 896 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 pictures | 310 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W235 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Cost at release | $1,999 | $699 |