Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 III
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Announced September 2022
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 III Overview
Below is a in-depth analysis of the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 III, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and E-M5 III (20MP) and the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and E-M5 III (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-H2 was revealed 2 years later than the E-M5 III and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the Fujifilm X-H2 grades vs the E-M5 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 III Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus OM-D E-M5 III. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery and Olympus E-M5 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Olympus E-M5 III
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2022 | October 2019 | More recent by 36 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 1040k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Fujifilm X-H2
E-M5 III | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus E-M5 III
Fujifilm X-H2 | E-M5 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.00" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 III Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-H2 has exterior dimensions of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Olympus E-M5 III has sizing of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 compared to the E-M5 III.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M5 III is 62 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 III Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-H2 and E-M5 III.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-H2 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-H2 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 20 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-H2 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus E-M5 III Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2022-09-08 | 2019-10-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 82 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3.00 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,620k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/180000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 15.0fps | 30.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 7680x4320 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 660 gr (1.46 pounds) | 414 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 photographs | 310 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W235 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,999 | $1,199 |