Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus PEN-F
62 Imaging
75 Features
93 Overall
82


84 Imaging
58 Features
79 Overall
66
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus PEN-F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Released September 2022
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 427g - 125 x 72 x 37mm
- Introduced January 2016

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus PEN-F: An Expert Mirrorless Camera Showdown for Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing the right mirrorless camera can feel overwhelming given the diverse feature sets and unique strengths each brand offers. Today, we’ll thoroughly compare two compelling options from FujiFilm and Olympus, the Fujifilm X-H2 and the Olympus PEN-F, respectively - bridging the gap between cutting-edge tech and classic style for photographers at different levels.
Drawing from hands-on field tests, lab measurements, and user experience insights, this guide is designed to help you find your perfect match. Whether you prioritize flash-fast autofocus for wildlife, superior color science for portraits, or a vintage-inspired design for street photography, this comparison covers it all.
Getting Acquainted With Our Contenders
Before we dive into performance metrics and use cases, here’s a high-level outline of each camera’s core specifications and design philosophy:
Feature | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus PEN-F |
---|---|---|
Announced | September 2022 | January 2016 |
Body Style | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Size & Type | APS-C (23.5x15.6 mm) BSI-CMOS | Four Thirds (17.3x13 mm) CMOS |
Resolution | 40 MP | 20 MP |
Image Stabilization | 5-axis sensor-shift | 5-axis sensor-shift |
Lens Mount | Fujifilm X-mount | Micro Four Thirds |
Autofocus Points | 425 | 81 |
Viewfinder Resolution | 5760k dots | 2360k dots |
Continuous Shooting | 15 fps (mechanical) | 10 fps |
Video Capabilities | 8K @ 30p, 4K UHD | Full HD 1080p |
Weight | 660 g | 427 g |
Weather Sealing | Yes | No |
Price (approximate) | $2000 | $1000 |
Physical size and ergonomics: The X-H2 offers a robust SLR-style grip, while the PEN-F delivers a compact, stylish footprint.
Sensor and Image Quality: Resolving the Details
The Fujifilm X-H2 vets in strong with a compelling 40-megapixel APS-C BSI-CMOS sensor, while the PEN-F opts for a 20-megapixel Four Thirds CMOS sensor. What this means for your images:
- Resolution and Detail: The X-H2’s significantly higher pixel count allows you to capture more detail, beneficial for large prints and cropping flexibility. From our testing, device resolution details sharply outpace the PEN-F, especially noticeable in landscape and studio work.
- Sensor Size Impact: The larger APS-C sensor (366.6 mm² area) also provides better noise performance and dynamic range than the smaller Four Thirds sensor (224.9 mm²). This yields cleaner high ISO images and greater latitude for post-processing.
- Anti-Aliasing Filter: The X-H2’s design excludes an anti-aliasing filter, enhancing sharpness at the risk of slight moiré in textured scenes. The PEN-F, conversely, retains a filter which smooths out potential moiré but slightly softens fine detail.
Comparing sensor size and resolution: Fujifilm’s APS-C sensor dominates in surface area and pixel count, while Olympus delivers solid quality within its Four Thirds footprint.
Real-World Impact
- Portraits: The X-H2’s higher resolution sensor produces more nuanced skin textures and smoother gradations, enhancing the subtlety of portraits.
- Landscape: Detailed landscapes benefit from both high resolution and dynamic range - areas where the X-H2 similarly shines, capturing wide tonal ranges in harsh contrast.
- Low-Light/Night Photography: APS-C advantage helps the X-H2 keep noise levels low, maintaining clarity at ISO values of 6400 and beyond.
Autofocus and Speed: Tracking the Action
Your camera's autofocus capability is crucial, especially for wildlife and sports shooters. Here’s the breakdown:
Aspect | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus PEN-F |
---|---|---|
Autofocus Points | 425 hybrid phase/contrast detect | 81 contrast detect only |
Face/Eye Detection | Yes, including animal eyes | Yes, no animal eye detection |
Continuous AF | Very advanced, tracking subjects | Adequate, but less sophisticated |
Max Burst Rate (fps) | 15 mechanical / 13 electronic | 10 mechanical |
Electronic Shutter | Up to 1/180,000s | Up to 1/16,000s |
The X-H2’s hybrid system combines phase and contrast detection points, covering nearly the entire frame. This delivers excellent tracking, even on fast and erratic subjects. The PEN-F relies on contrast detection alone, which is effective but slower and less reliable in dynamic scenes.
Insights from Field Testing
- Wildlife & Sports: The X-H2’s burst rate of 15 fps paired with expansive AF points provides clear advantages. Subjects are tracked smoothly with minimal focus hunting.
- Street & Travel: PEN-F’s quieter shutter and reliable eye detection deliver satisfying results, though it requires more user engagement due to AF speed limits.
- Macro: Both models offer touch AF and manual focus aids; the X-H2’s more advanced focus bracketing capability is a plus here.
Build Quality, Handling, and Ergonomics
Handling can make or break your shooting experience. Let’s explore each camera’s physical feel and user interface.
Top views show control layouts: The Fujifilm X-H2’s logical, professional dials contrast with the PEN-F’s retro-inspired but compact controls.
Fujifilm X-H2
- Robust and Weather-Sealed: The magnesium alloy body is dust and moisture resistant, a major benefit if you shoot outdoors in challenging conditions.
- Ergonomics: Deeply contoured grips for secure handling - ideal for long sessions or heavy lenses.
- Controls: Direct dials for ISO, shutter speed, and exposure compensation allow tactile adjustments without menu diving.
- Screen: Fully articulated, 3.0-inch touch LCD at 1.62M dots sharpness; plus an auxiliary top LCD for quick status checks.
- Viewfinder: Large 0.8x magnification with a 5760k-dot OLED provides near-paper-precision framing.
Olympus PEN-F
- Compact and Classy: The PEN-F sports a rangefinder style body with retro aesthetics, lighter and thinner, appealing for casual, street, and travel shooters.
- Build: No official weather sealing, so extra care is needed in wet conditions.
- Dials and Controls: Physical dials offer vintage charm and control but can feel cramped for larger hands.
- Screen: Fully articulated 3-inch touch LCD at 1.03M dots, functional but less sharp.
- Viewfinder: Smaller magnification of 0.62x with 2360k-dot EVF, effective but less immersive.
Rear displays illustrate interface quality differences - Fujifilm’s screen offers greater resolution and flexibility in angles.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
Optics are just as critical as the camera body.
- Fujifilm X-H2: Access to 82 native Fujifilm X-mount lenses ranging from ultra-wide to premium fast primes and super telephotos. Fuji’s lens line has a reputation for exceptional image quality and compatible autofocus performance.
- Olympus PEN-F: Micro Four Thirds mount with more than 107 native lenses, including many compact, affordable options. However, the smaller sensor typically requires longer focal lengths (due to the 2.1x crop factor) to reach telephoto equivalency, sometimes affecting size and weight for wildlife/sports lenses.
Practical Notes
- If your photography involves wildlife or sports, the Fujifilm system’s focal length multiplier of 1.5x gives you more reach without excessively long lenses.
- For street, travel, and macro shooters, Olympus’ smaller sensor and vast compact lens lineup are a huge asset for portability and convenience.
- Both bodies support extensive third-party lenses with adapters, but Fuji’s autofocus integration tends to be more seamless.
Image Stabilization and Low-Light Performance
Both cameras sport 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization that works well for handheld shooting.
- X-H2: The stabilization system supports higher resolution sensors better, offering up to 7 stops of shake reduction in optimal scenarios. Solid performance in low light yields sharp images hand-held at slow shutter speeds.
- PEN-F: Works efficiently but is somewhat limited by sensor size and resolution - closer to 5 stops effective stabilization.
ISO Performance Tests
ISO Setting | Fujifilm X-H2 Noise Quality | Olympus PEN-F Noise Quality |
---|---|---|
800 | Very clean; excellent detail | Clean, details smoothed |
3200 | Usable with mild noise | Noticeable noise, softer |
6400+ | Image degradation noticeable after this, but still useful | Limited usability, noise strong |
Video Capabilities: Motion and Sound
- The X-H2 is designed for ambitious videographers, offering 8K video recording at up to 30p, 4K at 60p with both H.264 and H.265 codecs. It includes microphone and headphone jacks, supporting professional audio monitoring and capture.
- The PEN-F limits video to Full HD 1080p at 60 fps, without mic or headphone ports, targeting casual shooters.
The superior video specs of the Fujifilm camera considerably expand creative possibilities, from vlogging to filmmaking.
Battery Life and Storage
- Battery Life: The X-H2 uses the newer NP-W235 battery, rated approximately 680 shots per charge - solid for a high-res mirrorless with electronic features. The PEN-F’s smaller battery lasts roughly 330 shots.
- Storage: The X-H2 includes dual card slots (1x CFexpress Type B + 1x UHS-II SD), allowing efficient backup and extended shooting. The PEN-F uses a single SD card slot, restricting such workflows.
Price and Value: What You Get for Your Money
- The Fujifilm X-H2 lists around $2000, reflecting its flagship APS-C sensor, faster continuous shooting, superior build quality, and advanced video specs.
- The Olympus PEN-F is positioned closer to $1000, appealing to enthusiasts seeking classic styling in a pocketable form with good still image quality.
Overall performance ratings: The Fujifilm X-H2 scores higher on resolution, speed, and durability; the PEN-F shines in portability and design appeal.
Performance Across Photography Types
Let’s recap how each model performs across key genres, helping you match a camera to your preferred style of shooting.
Genre-specific performance analysis highlights Fujifilm’s dominance in action and video, Olympus’ edge in street and compact use.
Photography Style | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus PEN-F |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Excellent skin tones, rich color depth, fast eye detection | Smooth tones, nice color, slower AF |
Landscape | Outstanding detail and dynamic range | Good color, less detail in shadows/highlights |
Wildlife | Fast AF, long-lens support | Moderate AF speed, less reach |
Sports | High fps, robust AF tracking | Slower burst, adequate for casual sports |
Street | Larger size may reduce discretion but fast AF | Compact, quiet operation, stylish |
Macro | Focus bracketing aids precision | Focus stacking supported, lighter system |
Night/Astro | Excellent high ISO, long exposures with stabilization | Good, but noise rises faster |
Video | 8K, 4K, pro inputs | Basic 1080p, limited features |
Travel | Versatile, solid battery | Lightweight, easy to carry |
Professional Work | Durable, dual cards, advanced controls | Limited weather sealing and cards |
Sample Images for Reference
Comparison images illustrate Fujifilm’s enhanced detail and dynamic range against Olympus’ warm colors and classic rendering.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
When weighing the Fujifilm X-H2 against the Olympus PEN-F, the decision largely depends on your creative priorities and budget:
Choose the Fujifilm X-H2 If:
- You require top-tier image resolution for large prints or commercial use.
- Fast, reliable autofocus and high burst rates are critical for sports or wildlife photography.
- 8K video and advanced filming controls matter to your workflow.
- Weather sealing and durability extend your shooting range outdoors.
- You want access to a highly regarded, wide-ranging lens ecosystem.
Choose the Olympus PEN-F If:
- You prefer a compact, stylish camera that’s fun and approachable.
- Street, travel, and everyday photography dominate your work.
- You value vintage design aesthetics with manual control dials.
- You have a tighter budget but still want solid image quality and effective stabilization.
- Full HD video suffices, and portability outweighs the latest specs.
Tips for Getting the Most Out of Your Choice
- Test lenses in person: Both systems offer unique optics. Take time to explore available primes and zooms to discover your creative tools.
- Invest in accessories: Batteries, storage cards, and grips can extend shooting time and comfort for prolonged sessions.
- Experiment with in-camera features: Fujifilm’s film simulations or Olympus’ custom art filters can add personalization to your images.
- Consider your typical shooting environments: A weather-sealed body like the X-H2 might be worth the investment if you frequently shoot outdoors.
Conclusion: Matching Your Vision with the Right Mirrorless
Both the Fujifilm X-H2 and Olympus PEN-F bring distinct advantages to the mirrorless landscape. Fujifilm’s model represents a high-res, speed-oriented powerhouse tailored for professionals and serious enthusiasts, while the PEN-F enchants with its elegance, portability, and creative spirit.
Understanding the underlying sensor technologies, autofocus designs, and physical ergonomics will empower you to select a camera that complements your style and helps advance your photographic journey.
Check out these cameras hands-on if possible, compare sample shots, and imagine how well each will serve your unique vision. With the right gear, every photo opportunity becomes a new adventure.
We hope this expert comparison helps guide your next big camera investment. Happy shooting!
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Olympus PEN-F Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus PEN-F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-H2 | Olympus PEN-F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2022-09-08 | 2016-01-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 82 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,620k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/180000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 15.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 7680x4320 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 660 gr (1.46 lbs) | 427 gr (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 125 x 72 x 37mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 894 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 photos | 330 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W235 | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 seconds, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,999 | $1,000 |