Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300 front
Portability
63
Imaging
45
Features
51
Overall
47

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300 Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Replacement is Olympus E-410
Sony HX300
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 80 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
  • 623g - 130 x 103 x 93mm
  • Announced February 2013
  • Older Model is Sony HX200V
  • Later Model is Sony HX400V
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300 Overview

Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-400 and Sony HX300, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap between the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and HX300 (20MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and HX300 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-400 was announced 7 years before the HX300 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony HX300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-400 scores against the HX300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Sony HX300

 E-400 HX300 

Reasons to pick Sony HX300 over the Olympus E-400

 HX300 E-400 
AnnouncedFebruary 2013September 2006Fresher by 78 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k215kClearer screen (+706k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Sony HX300

 E-400 HX300 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-400 has external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Sony HX300 has measurements of 130mm x 103mm x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7") along with a weight of 623 grams (1.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-400 and Sony HX300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-400 against the HX300.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-400 and HX300 is 77 and 63 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-400 and HX300.

Clearly, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony HX300 will resolve extra detail with its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 Portrait photography advice
Sony HX300 Portrait photography advice
46
focusing manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (10MP)
43
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Street photography camera
Sony HX300 as a Street photography camera
60
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
50
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than competitors (623 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography details
Sony HX300 Sports photography details
38
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
55
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography info
Sony HX300 Travel photography info
49
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
54
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
great reach (1200mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competitors (623g)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography details
Sony HX300 Landscape photography details
45
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
49
you can focus manually
pretty wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging information
Sony HX300 Vlogging information
9
can't record video
25
pretty wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of external microphone socket
more heavy than competitors (623g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-400 vs Sony HX300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Sony HX300
 Olympus E-400Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-400 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX300
Type Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2006-09-14 2013-02-20
Physical type Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 5184 x 3888
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-1200mm (50.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-6.3
Amount of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye -
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps)
Highest video resolution None 1920x1080
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435 gr (0.96 pounds) 623 gr (1.37 pounds)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 130 x 103 x 93mm (5.1" x 4.1" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card -
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $599 $339