Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62910/62910d377a481443615e2f3c48c7678cc9c467ae" alt="Fujifilm X-H2 front Fujifilm X-H2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57da5/57da55bc092010e6c2734595d664451750b4424f" alt="Sigma sd Quattro front Sigma sd Quattro front"
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Released September 2022
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and Quattro (29MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor size (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The Fujifilm X-H2 was revealed 6 years later than the Quattro and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Fujifilm X-H2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm X-H2 grades vs the Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-H2 & Sigma sd Quattro. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Sigma Quattro
Fujifilm X-H2 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2022 | ![]() | February 2016 | More recent by 80 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Fujifilm X-H2
Quattro | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Sigma Quattro
Fujifilm X-H2 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3.00" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 1620k | Identical screen resolution |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-H2 has exterior measurements of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") along with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 against the Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03064/0306407ea43da2af227f08920f072fce5a6633fa" alt="Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H2 and Quattro is 62 and 63 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05025/0502593de8a30bc12b2777f2b23e2246167d39ed" alt="Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Quattro.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Fujifilm X-H2 to offer more detail because of its extra 11MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-H2 will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09ce4/09ce415052c2dd76641d1d5a6304e27a0c23993d" alt="Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison"
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e66ff/e66ff3cb29cbaf1f0798d3bf55dc518121f94fa7" alt="Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model | Fujifilm X-H2 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2022-09-08 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Sigma SA |
Amount of lenses | 82 | 76 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.00 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,620k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/180000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 15.0 frames per second | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | - |
Highest video resolution | 7680x4320 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 660 gr (1.46 lb) | 625 gr (1.38 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W235 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Retail price | $1,999 | $738 |