Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H
62 Imaging
76 Features
93 Overall
82
78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 40MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
- Revealed September 2022
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-H1
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
The following is a thorough review of the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sigma. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and the Quattro H (45MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and Quattro H (APS-H) feature totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-H2 was unveiled 6 years after the Quattro H which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-H2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm X-H2 matches up against the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-H2 and Sigma sd Quattro H. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-H2 Gallery and Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Sigma Quattro H
Fujifilm X-H2 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2022 | February 2016 | Newer by 80 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Fujifilm X-H2
Quattro H | Fujifilm X-H2 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Sigma Quattro H
Fujifilm X-H2 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3.00" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 1620k | Same screen resolution |
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H2 offers outer measurements of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 against the Quattro H.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H2 and Quattro H is 62 and 78 respectively.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The pic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Quattro H.
Plainly, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-H2 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will give you greater detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-H2 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Fujifilm X-H2 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model | Fujifilm X-H2 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-09-08 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-H |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 40 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 7728 x 5152 | 6200 x 4152 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 82 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,620k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/180000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 15.0fps | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p | - |
Maximum video resolution | 7680x4320 | - |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 660g (1.46 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 680 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W235 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Retail cost | $1,999 | $1,134 |