Clicky

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H

Portability
62
Imaging
76
Features
93
Overall
82
Fujifilm X-H2 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro H front
Portability
78
Imaging
72
Features
59
Overall
66

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs

Fujifilm X-H2
(Full Review)
  • 40MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 7680 x 4320 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 660g - 136 x 93 x 95mm
  • Revealed September 2022
  • Succeeded the Fujifilm X-H1
Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview

The following is a thorough review of the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Sigma. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-H2 (40MP) and the Quattro H (45MP) is pretty well matched but the Fujifilm X-H2 (APS-C) and Quattro H (APS-H) feature totally different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The Fujifilm X-H2 was unveiled 6 years after the Quattro H which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-H2 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the Fujifilm X-H2 matches up against the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-H2 over the Sigma Quattro H

 Fujifilm X-H2 Quattro H 
LaunchedSeptember 2022February 2016Newer by 80 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Fujifilm X-H2

 Quattro H Fujifilm X-H2 

Common features in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Sigma Quattro H

 Fujifilm X-H2 Quattro H 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen dimension3.00"3"Identical screen dimensions
Screen resolution1620k1620kSame screen resolution

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison

If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-H2 offers outer measurements of 136mm x 93mm x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") and a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro H has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Look at the Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Fujifilm X-H2 against the Quattro H.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-H2 and Quattro H is 62 and 78 respectively.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specifications. The pic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-H2 and Quattro H.

Plainly, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-H2 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will give you greater detail having an extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer Fujifilm X-H2 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-H2 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma Quattro H as a Portrait photography camera
85
you can focus manually
megapixel count great (40 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW formats
83
has manual focus
great MP (45MP)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X-H2 Street photography information
Sigma Quattro H Street photography information
73
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
features focus via touch
weather proofing
heavier than competitors (660g)
70
decent sensor size (APS-H)
supports RAW files
environment proofing
no moving screen
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-H2 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma Quattro H as a Sports photography camera
88
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
silent mode (1/180,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count great (40 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
weather proofing
great battery power (680 shots)
supports phase detect auto focus
71
great MP (45MP)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
comes with phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.8 fps)
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm X-H2
Travel photography with Sigma Quattro H
74
great battery power (680 CIPA)
weather proofing
supports bluetooth
features focus via touch
megapixel count great (40MP)
display is selfie friendly
heavier than competitors (660g)
65
environment proofing
great MP (45 megapixels)
no Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly display
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Fujifilm X-H2
Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro H
86
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
pretty good screen size (3.00 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count great (40MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
no anti-alias filter
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
great battery power (680 shots)
has double storage slots
75
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
great MP (45 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-H)
supports RAW files
environment proofing
no image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-H2 Vlogging highlights
Sigma Quattro H Vlogging highlights
74
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focus
video res high (7680 x 4320 pxls)
comes with mic port
heavier than competitors (660 grams)
26
offers face detection autofocus
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video ( resolution)
no external microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Fujifilm X-H2 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-H2 and Sigma Quattro H
 Fujifilm X-H2Sigma sd Quattro H
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Sigma
Model Fujifilm X-H2 Sigma sd Quattro H
Class Advanced Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2022-09-08 2016-02-23
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size APS-C APS-H
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 26.6 x 17.9mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 476.1mm²
Sensor resolution 40 megapixel 45 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 7728 x 5152 6200 x 4152
Maximum native ISO 12800 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 -
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW pictures
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 425 9
Lens
Lens mount Fujifilm X Sigma SA
Number of lenses 82 76
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.4
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3.00 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,620k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 5,760k dot 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.8x 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/180000s -
Continuous shutter speed 15.0fps 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings no built-in flash no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 8192 x 4320 @ 30p -
Maximum video resolution 7680x4320 -
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 660g (1.46 lb) -
Dimensions 136 x 93 x 95mm (5.4" x 3.7" x 3.7") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 680 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NP-W235 BP-61
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage 1x CFexpress Type B, 1x UHS-II SD SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Two Single
Retail cost $1,999 $1,134