Fujifilm X-M1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
87 Imaging
57 Features
63 Overall
59


60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 330g - 117 x 67 x 39mm
- Revealed September 2013
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D

Fujifilm X-M1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Its time to look closer at the Fujifilm X-M1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-M1 (16MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the Fujifilm X-M1 (APS-C) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) come with totally different sensor measurements.

The Fujifilm X-M1 was unveiled 6 years prior to the X1D II 50C and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-M1 matches up against the X1D II 50C for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm X-M1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-M1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-M1 Gallery and Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-M1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-M1 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Fujifilm X-M1
X1D II 50C | Fujifilm X-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | ![]() | September 2013 | More recent by 70 months |
Display sizing | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+1440k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-M1 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-M1 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-M1 comes with exterior dimensions of 117mm x 67mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-M1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-M1 vs the X1D II 50C.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-M1 and X1D II 50C is 87 and 60 respectively.

Fujifilm X-M1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading specs. The visual here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-M1 and X1D II 50C.
All in all, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-M1 using its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh trickier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer greater detail having an extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-M1 is going to be behind in sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-M1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-M1 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Fujifilm X-M1 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model | Fujifilm X-M1 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-09-17 | 2019-06-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXR Processor II | - |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS I | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 51 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 8272 x 6200 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 49 | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Hasselblad X |
Total lenses | 54 | 13 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3.60" |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 3,690 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/10000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 6.0 frames per sec | 2.7 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (ISO200m) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto / Forced Flash / Suppressed Flash / Slow Synchro / Rear-curtain Synchro / Commander | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 30p, Continuous recording: up to approx. 14 min./1280 x 720 30p, Continuous recording: up to approx. 27 min. | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 2720x1530 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 117 x 67 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-W126 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec.) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD memory card / SDHC memory card / SDXC (UHS-I) memory card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | One | Two |
Launch cost | $399 | $5,750 |