Fujifilm X-M1 vs Ricoh GR
87 Imaging
58 Features
63 Overall
60
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 330g - 117 x 67 x 39mm
- Launched September 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm X-M1 vs Ricoh GR Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Fujifilm X-M1 vs Ricoh GR, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-M1 (16MP) and the GR (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (APS-C).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe Fujifilm X-M1 was revealed 6 months after the GR so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X-M1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-M1 matches up vs the GR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm X-M1 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-M1 and Ricoh GR. The full galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-M1 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-M1 over the Ricoh GR
| Fujifilm X-M1 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Fujifilm X-M1
| GR | Fujifilm X-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 920k | Clearer screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-M1 and Ricoh GR
| Fujifilm X-M1 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2013 |  | April 2013 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-M1 enjoys external dimensions of 117mm x 67mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs) and the Ricoh GR has measurements of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Fujifilm X-M1 vs Ricoh GR in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-M1 and the GR.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-M1 and GR is 87 and 90 respectively.
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-M1 and GR.
To sum up, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you should expect comparable quality of images although you would want to consider the production date of the cameras into account.
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm X-M1 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Fujifilm X-M1 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-M1 | Ricoh GR |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2013-09-17 | 2013-04-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | EXR Processor II | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS I | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Number of lenses | 54 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 920k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 300s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 6.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO200m) | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto / Forced Flash / Suppressed Flash / Slow Synchro / Rear-curtain Synchro / Commander | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 30p, Continuous recording: up to approx. 14 min./1280 x 720 30p, Continuous recording: up to approx. 27 min. | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 330 gr (0.73 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 117 x 67 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 290 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-W126 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec.) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD memory card / SDHC memory card / SDXC (UHS-I) memory card | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $399 | $971 |
