Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
78 Imaging
70 Features
81 Overall
74


60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 497g - 141 x 83 x 46mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-Pro2
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X2D

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Fujifilm X-Pro3 versus Hasselblad X1D II 50C, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Hasselblad. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (26MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (APS-C) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) posses totally different sensor sizes.

The Fujifilm X-Pro3 was announced 5 months later than the X1D II 50C which means that they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the Fujifilm X-Pro3 matches up against the X1D II 50C with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-Pro3 & Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-Pro3 Gallery & Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-Pro3 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Fujifilm X-Pro3
X1D II 50C | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1620k | Clearer screen (+740k dot) |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | ![]() | June 2019 | Similar age |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 offers physical dimensions of 141mm x 83mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has sizing of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-Pro3 versus Hasselblad X1D II 50C in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and the X1D II 50C.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and X1D II 50C is 78 and 60 respectively.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through a spec sheet. The visual below will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and X1D II 50C.
Clearly, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give greater detail with its extra 25MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Hasselblad |
Model | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-10-23 | 2019-06-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | X-Processor 4 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26MP | 51MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 8272 x 6200 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 117 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Hasselblad X |
Number of lenses | 54 | 13 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3.60 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,620 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 3,690 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/10000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0fps | 2.7fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 2720x1530 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 725g (1.60 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 83 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-W126 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Dual | Dual |
Launch pricing | $2,000 | $5,750 |