Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M-E Typ 220
78 Imaging
70 Features
81 Overall
74


79 Imaging
64 Features
28 Overall
49
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 497g - 141 x 83 x 46mm
- Revealed October 2019
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm X-Pro2
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Introduced September 2012

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Overview
Here is a complete comparison of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Leica M-E Typ 220, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies FujiFilm and Leica. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (26MP) and M-E Typ 220 (18MP) and the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (APS-C) and M-E Typ 220 (Full frame) posses different sensor dimensions.

The Fujifilm X-Pro3 was manufactured 7 years later than the M-E Typ 220 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm X-Pro3 grades versus the M-E Typ 220 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-Pro3 & Leica M-E Typ 220. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-Pro3 Gallery & Leica M-E Typ 220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-Pro3 over the Leica M-E Typ 220
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2019 | ![]() | September 2012 | Fresher by 87 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M-E Typ 220 over the Fujifilm X-Pro3
M-E Typ 220 | Fujifilm X-Pro3 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Leica M-E Typ 220
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | M-E Typ 220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 has physical dimensions of 141mm x 83mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Leica M-E Typ 220 has measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Leica M-E Typ 220 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 compared to the M-E Typ 220.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and M-E Typ 220 is 78 and 79 respectively.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing merely by going over specs. The photograph here might give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and M-E Typ 220.
All in all, both the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Fujifilm X-Pro3 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-Pro3 should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M-E Typ 220 Specifications
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Leica M-E Typ 220 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model type | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Leica M-E Typ 220 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-10-23 | 2012-09-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | X-Processor 4 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 5212 x 3472 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 2500 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Leica M |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 59 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,620k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 pounds) | 585 gr (1.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 83 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 787 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-W126 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support) | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Price at release | $2,000 | $0 |