Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M Typ 240
78 Imaging
71 Features
81 Overall
75
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M Typ 240 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 497g - 141 x 83 x 46mm
- Released October 2019
- Replaced the Fujifilm X-Pro2
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M Typ 240 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Leica M Typ 240, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Pro Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Leica. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (26MP) and the M Typ 240 (24MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (APS-C) and M Typ 240 (Full frame) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm X-Pro3 was released 7 years after the M Typ 240 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the Fujifilm X-Pro3 grades versus the M Typ 240 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M Typ 240 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-Pro3 & Leica M Typ 240. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-Pro3 Gallery & Leica M Typ 240 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-Pro3 over the Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | September 2012 | More modern by 87 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1620k | 920k | Sharper display (+700k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Fujifilm X-Pro3
M Typ 240 | Fujifilm X-Pro3 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Leica M Typ 240
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M Typ 240 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 provides outer measurements of 141mm x 83mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Leica M Typ 240 has dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Leica M Typ 240 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 versus the M Typ 240.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and M Typ 240 is 78 and 74 respectively.
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M Typ 240 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and M Typ 240.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh tougher and the Fujifilm X-Pro3 will resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-Pro3 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M Typ 240 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Leica M Typ 240 Specifications
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Leica M Typ 240 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | Leica |
Model | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Leica M Typ 240 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-10-23 | 2012-09-17 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | X-Processor 4 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 5952 x 3976 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Max enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Leica M |
Available lenses | 54 | 59 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Optical (rangefinder) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 1% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.68x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lb) | 680g (1.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 141 x 83 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 84 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1860 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | One |
Retail pricing | $2,000 | $5,479 |