Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus E-P7
78 Imaging
70 Features
81 Overall
74


86 Imaging
63 Features
84 Overall
71
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus E-P7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 497g - 141 x 83 x 46mm
- Announced October 2019
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-Pro2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 337g - 118 x 69 x 38mm
- Announced June 2021

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus E-P7 Overview
The following is a extensive overview of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus E-P7, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (26MP) and E-P7 (20MP) and the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (APS-C) and E-P7 (Four Thirds) have different sensor sizes.

The Fujifilm X-Pro3 was released 19 months before the E-P7 making them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm X-Pro3 matches up versus the E-P7 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus E-P7 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Olympus PEN E-P7. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-Pro3 Gallery and Olympus E-P7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-Pro3 over the Olympus E-P7
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | E-P7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P7 over the Fujifilm X-Pro3
E-P7 | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2021 | ![]() | October 2019 | Newer by 19 months |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Olympus E-P7
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | E-P7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3.00" | Equal display dimensions |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus E-P7 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 provides exterior dimensions of 141mm x 83mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus E-P7 has measurements of 118mm x 69mm x 38mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 337 grams (0.74 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus E-P7 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs the E-P7.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and E-P7 is 78 and 86 respectively.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus E-P7 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and E-P7.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm X-Pro3 will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-Pro3 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus E-P7 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Olympus E-P7 Specifications
Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Olympus PEN E-P7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Olympus PEN E-P7 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-10-23 | 2021-06-09 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | X-Processor 4 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 160 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 80 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 118 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.00" |
Display resolution | 1,620k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 20.0fps | 8.7fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash off, Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Slow sync. (1st curtain), Slow sync. (2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | BLS-50 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lb) | 337 gr (0.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 83 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 118 x 69 x 38mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-W126 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail cost | $2,000 | $800 |