Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Sigma Quattro
78 Imaging
71 Features
81 Overall
75
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 497g - 141 x 83 x 46mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Succeeded the Fujifilm X-Pro2
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Sigma Quattro, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals FujiFilm and Sigma. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 (26MP) and the Quattro (29MP) is fairly well matched and they use the exact same sensor dimensions (APS-C).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X-Pro3 was manufactured 3 years after the Quattro which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a simple summation of how the Fujifilm X-Pro3 scores vs the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-Pro3 & Sigma sd Quattro. The entire galleries are available at Fujifilm X-Pro3 Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-Pro3 over the Sigma Quattro
| Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2019 |  | February 2016 | More modern by 45 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Fujifilm X-Pro3
| Quattro | Fujifilm X-Pro3 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Sigma Quattro
| Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Display resolution | 1620k |  | 1620k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-Pro3 enjoys physical dimensions of 141mm x 83mm x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
See the Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Sigma Quattro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and the Quattro.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Quattro is 78 and 63 respectively.
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The picture here may provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-Pro3 and Quattro.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sigma Quattro to give you extra detail due to its extra 3MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-Pro3 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Fujifilm X-Pro3 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
| Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Sigma |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-Pro3 | Sigma sd Quattro |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2019-10-23 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | X-Processor 4 | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 26MP | 29MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 425 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Sigma SA |
| Amount of lenses | 54 | 76 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,620 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic and Optical (tunnel) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 20.0 frames per second | 3.8 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | - |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 625g (1.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 141 x 83 x 46mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-W126 | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II support) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $2,000 | $738 |