Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB35F
52 Imaging
37 Features
55 Overall
44
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-624mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 920g - 135 x 107 x 149mm
- Launched November 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S1 (12MP) and WB35F (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-S1 (2/3") and WB35F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Fujifilm X-S1 was released 3 years earlier than the WB35F which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-S1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB35F being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm X-S1 grades versus the WB35F for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-S1 & Samsung WB35F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-S1 Gallery & Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S1 over the Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm X-S1 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Fujifilm X-S1
| WB35F | Fujifilm X-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2014 |  | November 2011 | Newer by 25 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S1 and Samsung WB35F
| Fujifilm X-S1 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm X-S1 comes with outside dimensions of 135mm x 107mm x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") accompanied by a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB35F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-S1 against the WB35F.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-S1 and WB35F is 52 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The pic here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-S1 and WB35F.
As you can tell, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-S1 because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB35F will resolve extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm X-S1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Fujifilm X-S1 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-S1 | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2011-11-24 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-624mm (26.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 920 grams (2.03 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 135 x 107 x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-95 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $399 | $130 |