Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB750
52 Imaging
37 Features
55 Overall
44
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-624mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 920g - 135 x 107 x 149mm
- Revealed November 2011
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Fujifilm X-S1 and Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-S1 (12MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm X-S1 (2/3") and WB750 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm X-S1 was unveiled 3 months after the WB750 and they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-S1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Fujifilm X-S1 scores vs the WB750 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-S1 and Samsung WB750. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-S1 Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S1 over the Samsung WB750
| Fujifilm X-S1 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Fujifilm X-S1
| WB750 | Fujifilm X-S1 |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S1 and Samsung WB750
| Fujifilm X-S1 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | November 2011 |  | September 2011 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you should consider its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-S1 enjoys physical dimensions of 135mm x 107mm x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") having a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Fujifilm X-S1 and Samsung WB750 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-S1 versus the WB750.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm X-S1 and WB750 is 52 and 93 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The image underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-S1 and WB750.
All in all, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-S1 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Samsung WB750 will result in extra detail having an extra 1MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively.
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Fujifilm X-S1 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm X-S1 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-11-24 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXR | - |
| Sensor type | EXRCMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 2/3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8.8 x 6.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 58.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 13MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 49 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-624mm (26.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 4.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.00 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 920 grams (2.03 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 135 x 107 x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 49 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 20.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 216 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-95 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $399 | $339 |