Clicky

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F

Portability
52
Imaging
38
Features
55
Overall
44
Fujifilm X-S1 front
 
Samsung WB800F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs

Fujifilm X-S1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-624mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 920g - 135 x 107 x 149mm
  • Released November 2011
Samsung WB800F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
  • Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview

Below is a thorough overview of the Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S1 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-S1 (2/3") and WB800F (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm X-S1 was introduced 13 months earlier than the WB800F making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-S1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief summary of how the Fujifilm X-S1 matches up versus the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S1 over the Samsung WB800F

 Fujifilm X-S1 WB800F 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm X-S1

 WB800F Fujifilm X-S1 
LaunchedJanuary 2013November 2011More recent by 13 months
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm X-S1 and Samsung WB800F

 Fujifilm X-S1 WB800F 
Manual focus Dial accurate focus
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Display resolution460k460kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-S1 has got external dimensions of 135mm x 107mm x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") and a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

See the Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-S1 vs the WB800F.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-S1 and WB800F is 52 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The graphic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-S1 and WB800F.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-S1 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Samsung WB800F will result in extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-S1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Portrait photography factors
Samsung WB800F Portrait photography factors
46
you can focus manually
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor size (2/3")
44
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
features face detection autofocus
external flash not possible
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm X-S1
Street photography with Samsung WB800F
52
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
small sensor size (2/3")
more heavy than average (920g)
62
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm X-S1
Sports photography with Samsung WB800F
44
long zoom range (24-624mm 26.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has tracking autofocus
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor size (2/3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
53
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Travel photography features
Samsung WB800F Travel photography features
43
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long reach (624mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than average (920g)
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-S1 Landscape photography info
Samsung WB800F Landscape photography info
45
you can focus manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low resolution (12MP)
small sensor size (2/3")
lack of Timelapse function
50
manual focus
decently wide (23mm)
screen is a good size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm X-S1
Vlogging with Samsung WB800F
26
quite wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
has face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external microphone jack
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
more heavy than average (920g)
35
decently wide (23mm)
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (218 grams)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Fujifilm X-S1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-S1 and Samsung WB800F
 Fujifilm X-S1Samsung WB800F
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Samsung
Model type Fujifilm X-S1 Samsung WB800F
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2011-11-24 2013-01-07
Physical type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by EXR -
Sensor type EXRCMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 2/3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 8.8 x 6.6mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 58.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 12800 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 49 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 24-624mm (26.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-5.6 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 4.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology TFT color LCD monitor TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 16 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 10.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 8.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync -
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 920 grams (2.03 lbs) 218 grams (0.48 lbs)
Dimensions 135 x 107 x 149mm (5.3" x 4.2" x 5.9") 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 49 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 20.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 11.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 216 not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-95 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $399 $300