Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M5 II
73 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77
80 Imaging
53 Features
84 Overall
65
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M5 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 465g - 126 x 85 x 65mm
- Launched October 2020
- Successor is Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Launched February 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M5
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M5 III
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M5 II Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-M5 II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S10 (26MP) and E-M5 II (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-S10 (APS-C) and E-M5 II (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm X-S10 was revealed 5 years after the E-M5 II which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Fujifilm X-S10 matches up against the E-M5 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M5 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm X-S10 & Olympus OM-D E-M5 II. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-S10 Gallery & Olympus E-M5 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S10 over the Olympus E-M5 II
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2020 | February 2015 | Newer by 70 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Sharper display (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Fujifilm X-S10
E-M5 II | Fujifilm X-S10 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-M5 II
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-M5 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M5 II Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-S10 has physical measurements of 126mm x 85mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") having a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Olympus E-M5 II has proportions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") along with a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-M5 II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 against the E-M5 II.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-M5 II is 73 and 80 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M5 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions just by checking specs. The pic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-M5 II.
All in all, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-S10 using its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-S10 will give you extra detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher Fujifilm X-S10 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M5 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-M5 II Specifications
Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2020-10-15 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 465 gr (1.03 lb) | 469 gr (1.03 lb) |
Dimensions | 126 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 896 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photos | 310 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLN-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $999 | $699 |