Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Olympus FE-4030 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
21
Overall
30

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Olympus FE-4030
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both built by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and FE-4030 (14MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and FE-4030 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-300 was introduced 6 years prior to the FE-4030 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-300 grades versus the FE-4030 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Olympus FE-4030

 E-300 FE-4030 
Focus manually Dial exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus E-300

 FE-4030 E-300 
IntroducedJanuary 2010January 2005More recent by 60 months
Display dimensions2.7"1.8"Larger display (+0.9")
Display resolution230k134kSharper display (+96k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-4030

 E-300 FE-4030 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-300 has outer measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Olympus FE-4030 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-300 versus the FE-4030.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and FE-4030 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The visual below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and FE-4030.

Plainly, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus FE-4030 will give you more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus FE-4030 as a Portrait photography camera
48
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (8MP)
28
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography advice
Olympus FE-4030 Street photography advice
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
48
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography features
Olympus FE-4030 Sports photography features
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
doesn't have liveview
slow fps (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
34
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography details
Olympus FE-4030 Travel photography details
45
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
65
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
Landscape photography with Olympus FE-4030
43
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (1.8 inch)
doesn't have liveview
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
missing Time Lapse recording
32
pretty wide (26mm)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
does not have Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus FE-4030 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
25
pretty wide (26mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-300 vs Olympus FE-4030 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Olympus FE-4030
 Olympus E-300Olympus FE-4030
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-300 Olympus FE-4030
Also referred to as EVOLT E-300 -
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2005-01-10 2010-01-07
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3264 x 2448 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max enhanced ISO 1600 -
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-105mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.6-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 4cm
Total lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 1.8 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 134k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 5.80 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624 gr (1.38 pounds) 146 gr (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at release $800 $130