Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus SP-800 UZ front
Portability
69
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released September 2006
  • Renewed by Olympus E-410
Olympus SP-800 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2010
  • Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview

On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-400 was released 4 years earlier than the SP-800 UZ and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-400 matches up against the SP-800 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ

 E-400 SP-800 UZ 
Focus manually More precise focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-400

 SP-800 UZ E-400 
LaunchedFebruary 2010September 2006Fresher by 41 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution230k215kClearer display (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SP-800 UZ

 E-400 SP-800 UZ 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither includes Touch friendly display

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 features physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-400 and the SP-800 UZ.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and SP-800 UZ is 77 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and SP-800 UZ.

All in all, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will render extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-400 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus SP-800 UZ as a Portrait photography camera
46
you can focus manually
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no liveview feature
manual exposure not possible
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography details
Olympus SP-800 UZ Street photography details
60
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
46
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-400
Sports photography with Olympus SP-800 UZ
38
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
no liveview feature
max frames per second low (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
47
great zoom range (28-840mm 30.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
provides tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography factors
Olympus SP-800 UZ Travel photography factors
49
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
61
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
great reach (840mm)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography features
Olympus SP-800 UZ Landscape photography features
45
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inches)
no liveview feature
manual exposure not possible
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (10MP)
missing Timelapse mode
41
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging highlights
Olympus SP-800 UZ Vlogging highlights
9
can't record video
24
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external microphone support
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
 Olympus E-400Olympus SP-800 UZ
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-400 Olympus SP-800 UZ
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2006-09-14 2010-02-02
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Maximum boosted ISO - 1000
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 143
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-840mm (30.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-5.6
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 215k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 12s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 3.10 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video file format - H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 435g (0.96 lb) 455g (1.00 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 or 2 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $599 $270