Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86e58/86e58dbdc1df53889f3e4aef4918a9ae36fe6ab0" alt="Olympus SP-800 UZ front Olympus SP-800 UZ front"
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released September 2006
- Renewed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Launched February 2010
- Successor is Olympus SP-810 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the E-400 (10MP) and SP-800 UZ (14MP) and the E-400 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-400 was released 4 years earlier than the SP-800 UZ and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-400 matches up against the SP-800 UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-400 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-400 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-400
SP-800 UZ | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2010 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 41 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-400 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-400 features physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has specifications of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-400 and the SP-800 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8a42/f8a427dc8253595133310d252a9a245d81c4d515" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-400 and SP-800 UZ is 77 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9162b/9162bce8fa5597107dc07f11dc3f191f0e43e818" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-400 and SP-800 UZ.
All in all, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 due to its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will render extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The older E-400 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e18b/8e18b11e83086c7cf06ccd86ecfb0f837bb304fa" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d543/1d543457251adaac330e5d93a5547aaad3a71397" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-400 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2006-09-14 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 12s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 435g (0.96 lb) | 455g (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $599 | $270 |