Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL1
73 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 465g - 126 x 85 x 65mm
- Introduced October 2020
- Later Model is Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL1s
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-PL1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S10 (26MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-S10 (APS-C) and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm X-S10 was released 10 years after the E-PL1 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Fujifilm X-S10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short overview of how the Fujifilm X-S10 scores against the E-PL1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus PEN E-PL1. The complete galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-S10 Gallery and Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S10 over the Olympus E-PL1
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2020 | May 2010 | More modern by 127 months | |
Screen type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Fujifilm X-S10
E-PL1 | Fujifilm X-S10 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-PL1
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-S10 has got outer measurements of 126mm x 85mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") with a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1 has measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-PL1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 and the E-PL1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-PL1 is 73 and 86 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by checking specifications. The pic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-PL1.
Plainly, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-S10 featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Fujifilm X-S10 will give extra detail as a result of its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-S10 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2020-10-15 | 2010-05-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 54 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 465 grams (1.03 lbs) | 334 grams (0.74 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 126 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 487 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 images | 290 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $999 | $288 |