Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung SL202
73 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Bump to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 465g - 126 x 85 x 65mm
- Released October 2020
- Replacement is Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Additionally Known as PL50
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Fujifilm X-S10 and Samsung SL202, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S10 (26MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the Fujifilm X-S10 (APS-C) and SL202 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm X-S10 was unveiled 11 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-S10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Fujifilm X-S10 grades vs the SL202 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm X-S10 and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-S10 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S10 over the Samsung SL202
Fujifilm X-S10 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2020 | February 2009 | More recent by 142 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm X-S10
SL202 | Fujifilm X-S10 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S10 and Samsung SL202
Fujifilm X-S10 | SL202 |
---|
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm X-S10 comes with outside dimensions of 126mm x 85mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") having a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm X-S10 and Samsung SL202 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 compared to the SL202.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-S10 and SL202 is 73 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The graphic below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-S10 and SL202.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-S10 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Fujifilm X-S10 will offer you extra detail having an extra 16 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images far more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm X-S10 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Fujifilm X-S10 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model | Fujifilm X-S10 | Samsung SL202 |
Also Known as | - | PL50 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2020-10-15 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 54 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 465 gr (1.03 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 126 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $999 | $140 |