Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung WB800F
73 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77


92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 465g - 126 x 85 x 65mm
- Announced October 2020
- Refreshed by Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013

Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Following is a in-depth comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 and Samsung WB800F, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S10 (26MP) and WB800F (16MP) and the Fujifilm X-S10 (APS-C) and WB800F (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

The Fujifilm X-S10 was launched 7 years after the WB800F which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Fujifilm X-S10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm X-S10 matches up against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-S10 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are available at Fujifilm X-S10 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S10 over the Samsung WB800F
Fujifilm X-S10 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2020 | ![]() | January 2013 | More modern by 95 months |
Screen type | Fully articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm X-S10
WB800F | Fujifilm X-S10 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S10 and Samsung WB800F
Fujifilm X-S10 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-S10 has got outside dimensions of 126mm x 85mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") and a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm X-S10 and Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 vs the WB800F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-S10 and WB800F is 73 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes simply by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-S10 and WB800F.
As you can see, the 2 cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-S10 because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Fujifilm X-S10 will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-S10 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-S10 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Fujifilm X-S10 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
Model type | Fujifilm X-S10 | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2020-10-15 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Min native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 425 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Amount of lenses | 54 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 465 gr (1.03 lb) | 218 gr (0.48 lb) |
Dimensions | 126 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $999 | $300 |