Clicky

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III

Portability
79
Imaging
59
Features
76
Overall
65
Fujifilm X-T1 IR front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
Portability
67
Imaging
61
Features
96
Overall
75

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T1 IR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Boost to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 440g - 129 x 90 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Released February 2020
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview

Lets look much closer at the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M1 III, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (16MP) and the E-M1 III (20MP) is relatively close but the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (APS-C) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) have totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The Fujifilm X-T1 IR was revealed 5 years before the E-M1 III and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the Fujifilm X-T1 IR grades against the E-M1 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T1 IR over the Olympus E-M1 III

 Fujifilm X-T1 IR E-M1 III 
Screen resolution1040k1037kCrisper screen (+3k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Fujifilm X-T1 IR

 E-M1 III Fujifilm X-T1 IR 
ReleasedFebruary 2020August 2015Fresher by 55 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M1 III

 Fujifilm X-T1 IR E-M1 III 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurement

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR features exterior dimensions of 129mm x 90mm x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") with a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 III has measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M1 III in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR against the E-M1 III.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and E-M1 III is 79 and 67 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching specifications. The visual below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and E-M1 III.

To sum up, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older Fujifilm X-T1 IR will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography highlights
75
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detection focus
saves RAW formats
76
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Street photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 III Street photography highlights
75
has a tilting screen
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
does not have image stabilization
78
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
comes with focus by touch
environment proof
good high ISO (25,600)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M1 III as a Sports photography camera
65
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
does not have image stabilization
not so great battery (350 per charge)
80
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet mode (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
comes with phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Travel photography information
Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography information
63
weather sealing
resolution is good (16MP)
not so great battery (350 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
79
environment proof
has bluetooth
comes with focus by touch
good megapixels (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography highlights
71
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
does not have anti-alias filter
saves RAW formats
weather sealing
does not have image stabilization
not so great battery (350 per charge)
81
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
has dual storage slots
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-M1 III as a Vlogging camera
33
supports face detection focus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes external mic port
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
79
selfie friendly screen
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focusing
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M1 III
 Fujifilm X-T1 IROlympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
General Information
Make FujiFilm Olympus
Model type Fujifilm X-T1 IR Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Category Advanced Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Launched 2015-08-03 2020-02-11
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR Processor II TruePic IX
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.6mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 368.2mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4896 x 3264 5184 x 3888
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 -
Lowest native ISO 200 200
RAW images
Lowest enhanced ISO 100 64
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 121
Cross type focus points - 121
Lens
Lens support Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 54 107
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,040k dot 1,037k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.77x 0.74x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds 1/32000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 8.0fps 60.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 8.00 m (ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Synchro, Suppressed Flash, Rear-curtain Synchro, Commander Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 60p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 60p) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 4096x2160
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 440g (0.97 lbs) 580g (1.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 129 x 90 x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 420 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-W126 BLH-1
Self timer Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II) Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot)
Storage slots 1 Two
Retail cost $1,299 $1,800