Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10
79 Imaging
59 Features
76 Overall
65
![Fujifilm X-T1 IR front Fujifilm X-T1 IR front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X-T1-IR/Fujifilm-X-T1-IR-front.jpg)
![Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-OM-D-E-M10/Olympus-E-M10-front.jpg)
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Push to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 440g - 129 x 90 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 II
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Fujifilm X-T1 IR versus Olympus E-M10, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors FujiFilm and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (16MP) and the E-M10 (16MP) is relatively similar but the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (APS-C) and E-M10 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The Fujifilm X-T1 IR was introduced 17 months after the E-M10 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the Fujifilm X-T1 IR matches up versus the E-M10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Fujifilm X-T1 IR & Olympus OM-D E-M10. The whole galleries are provided at Fujifilm X-T1 IR Gallery & Olympus E-M10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T1 IR over the Olympus E-M10
Fujifilm X-T1 IR | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | March 2014 | More modern by 17 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1037k | Crisper screen (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Fujifilm X-T1 IR
E-M10 | Fujifilm X-T1 IR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M10
Fujifilm X-T1 IR | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR comes with outer measurements of 129mm x 90mm x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") and a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 has proportions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") having a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-T1 IR versus Olympus E-M10 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs the E-M10.
![Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T1-IR-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and E-M10 is 79 and 82 respectively.
![Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T1-IR-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes just by going over specifications. The image below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and E-M10.
To sum up, both cameras have the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR features the bigger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The newer Fujifilm X-T1 IR will have a benefit in sensor tech.
![Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Fujifilm-X-T1-IR-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder
![Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Fujifilm-X-T1-IR-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications
Fujifilm X-T1 IR | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model | Fujifilm X-T1 IR | Olympus OM-D E-M10 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-08-03 | 2014-03-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXR Processor II | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS X-TRANS II | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 368.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4896 x 3264 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.77x | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 8.00 m (ISO 100) | 5.80 m (ISO100) |
Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Synchro, Suppressed Flash, Rear-curtain Synchro, Commander | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30, 60p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 60p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 440 gr (0.97 lb) | 396 gr (0.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 129 x 90 x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 884 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126 | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,299 | $600 |