Clicky

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III

Portability
79
Imaging
60
Features
76
Overall
66
Fujifilm X-T1 IR front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs

Fujifilm X-T1 IR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 440g - 129 x 90 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Announced August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M10 IV
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview

Let's look more closely at the Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers FujiFilm and Olympus. The resolution of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (16MP) and the E-M10 III (16MP) is very close but the Fujifilm X-T1 IR (APS-C) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The Fujifilm X-T1 IR was unveiled 3 years prior to the E-M10 III and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).

Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-T1 IR scores against the E-M10 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T1 IR over the Olympus E-M10 III

 Fujifilm X-T1 IR E-M10 III 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Fujifilm X-T1 IR

 E-M10 III Fujifilm X-T1 IR 
AnnouncedAugust 2017August 2015More recent by 25 months
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M10 III

 Fujifilm X-T1 IR E-M10 III 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Display resolution1040k1040kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR has external measurements of 129mm x 90mm x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") along with a weight of 440 grams (0.97 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR compared to the E-M10 III.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and E-M10 III is 79 and 80 respectively.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by researching technical specs. The visual here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-T1 IR and E-M10 III.

As you have seen, each of these cameras offer the same exact megapixel count but not the same sensor measurements. The Fujifilm X-T1 IR features the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower DOF simpler. The older Fujifilm X-T1 IR will be behind in sensor tech.

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography highlights
76
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features face detection focus
supports RAW formats
73
manual focus
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm X-T1 IR
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 III
75
screen tilts
sensor size is good (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
environment proof
lack of image stabilization
77
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
has touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
heavier than average (410 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Fujifilm X-T1 IR
Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
65
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
good megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
environment proof
comes with phase detect auto focus
lack of image stabilization
low battery pack (350 CIPA)
69
silent mode (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect autofocus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Travel photography information
Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography information
63
environment proof
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
low battery pack (350 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
67
has touch to focus
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
heavier than average (410 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm X-T1 IR Landscape photography details
Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography details
71
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
good megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
no low pass filter
supports RAW formats
environment proof
lack of image stabilization
low battery pack (350 CIPA)
80
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm X-T1 IR
Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 III
33
features face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external mic socket
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
32
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
missing external mic support
heavier than average (410 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Fujifilm X-T1 IR vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-T1 IR and Olympus E-M10 III
 Fujifilm X-T1 IROlympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
General Information
Brand FujiFilm Olympus
Model Fujifilm X-T1 IR Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Type Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2015-08-03 2017-08-31
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip EXR Processor II TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS II CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.6mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 368.2mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4896 x 3264 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 -
Minimum native ISO 200 200
RAW data
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 121
Lens
Lens mount Fujifilm X Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 54 107
Focal length multiplier 1.5 2.1
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.77x 0.62x
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Max silent shutter speed 1/32000s 1/16000s
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames per second 8.6 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 8.00 m (ISO 100) 5.80 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Synchro, Suppressed Flash, Rear-curtain Synchro, Commander Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/180s 1/250s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30, 60p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 60p) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 440 gr (0.97 lbs) 410 gr (0.90 lbs)
Dimensions 129 x 90 x 47mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 1.9") 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 330 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-W126 BLS-50
Self timer Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II) SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported)
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $1,299 $650